Legal Opinion
Thiberg v. Bach
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 3, 1952No. Civ. 790-49PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action seeking an injunction and an accounting of profits for alleged patent infringement and unfair competition. In addition, alleging that .the character , of the infringement was wilful, wanton and deliberate, plaintiff asks that the damages be trebled. Costs and a reasonable attorney’s fee are also sought. Defendant filed an answer denying both the infringement and the unfair' competition and asserting the invalidity of the letters patent by reason of anticipation by the prior art and prior public use and sale.
The patent in suit, United…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Consolidated Boiler Corp. v. Bogue Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Boost Co. v. FaunceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- AH Emery Company v. Marcan Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Adolph Gottscho, Inc. v. American Marking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Sperry Rand Corporation v. Pentronix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Adolph Gottscho, Inc. v. American Marking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.