Legal Opinion

Sperry Rand Corporation v. Pentronix, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1970No. Civ. A. 43109PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, District Judge.

Discussion

The defendant Pentronix, Inc. hereinafter referred to as Pentronix manufactures magnetic memory cores at its facility in Frazer, Pennsylvania. In this diversity action, the plaintiffs are asserting that “Pentronix, together with three key employees have been engaging in unfair competition. In addition, the three individual defendants are accused of having breached their contractual agreements with Sperry Rand, (hereinafter referred to as Sperry) by whom they were previously employed. Specifically it is asserted that the individual defendants have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. SchnelbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Wexler v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Anaconda Co. v. Metric Tool & Die Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ark-Ell Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. 1st American Systems, Inc. v. RezattoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Pressure Science, Inc. v. KramerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API