Legal Opinion

Maynard v. . Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It is prescribed by C. S., 1743: “An action may be brought by any person against another who claims an estate or interest in real property adverse to him for the purpose of determining such adverse claims.”

Giving a liberal construction to this remedial statute, it is apparent that the court below was in error in dismissing this action. The pleadings were sufficient to raise an issue under which the court could proceed to determine the rights of the parties. Satterwhite v. Gallagher, 173 N. C., 525, 92 S. E., 369; Hardware Co. v. Cotton Co., 188 N. C., 442, 124 S. E., 756.

Reversed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. . GallagherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. N. Jacobi Hardware Co. v. Jones Cotton Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pressly v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Tolbert v. Greenwood Cotton MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948