Legal Opinion

State v. Derrick Brown, Leroy Carstarphen, and Kareem Strong (070200)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 2014No. A-113-11PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

Our Federal and State Constitutions protect the sanctity of the home from unreasonable searches by government officials. The constitutional protections afforded to the home make no distinction between a manor estate in an affluent town and a ramshackle hovel in an impoverished city. The occupants of both structures are clothed with the same constitutional rights. In both cases, the search of a home without a warrant is presumptively unreasonable, and the State therefore bears the burden of showing either that the defendant has no standing to challenge the search or that any such search falls…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. Kingkamau NantambuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. Lee v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. State v. Amir Randolph(076506) (Hudson County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. State V.charles Bryant,jr.(075958)(middlesex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. State v. Michael Lamb (071262)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API