Legal Opinion

Wintle v. Wright

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 20, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

We are here asked to examine the sufficiency of the declaration in a writ which invokes the ancient remedy of audita querela. Tested by demurrer, the declaration was deemed insufficient by the presiding justice below and exceptions were seasonably taken to his action in sustaining the demurrer.

“The writ (of audita querela) is a remedial process to relieve a party who has been injured or who is in danger of being injured from the consequences of a judgment because of some improper action of the party who obtained it which could not have been pleaded in bar to the action.” Martin’s Notes on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Parker v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Avery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Radclyffe v. BartonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Louis E. Bower, Inc. v. SilversteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. BlakesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. Pope v. Dean, No. Spnh 9606-47402 (May 22, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  4. Wintle v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API