Legal Opinion

Willoughby v. Montgomery Elevator Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 11, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · SwineyD. Michael Swiney, J.

in which HOUSTON M. GODDARD, P.J., and HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, J., joined.

Barbara Willoughby (“Plaintiff”) was injured exiting an elevator at her place of employment. Plaintiff sued Montgomery Elevator Company (“Defendant”) who had a contract with the Department of Energy (“DOE” or “Government”) to service and repair the elevator. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Defendant is an owner and operator of the elevator and, therefore, should be held to the higher standard of care of a common carrier. The Trial Court determined that the higher standard of care was not applicable and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Blair v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Southern B. & L. Ass'n v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kimball v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Pruneda v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Thomas & Associates, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API