Legal Opinion
Pruneda v. Otis Elevator Company
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 4, 1992No. 27628-0-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Anteha Pruneda appeals the judgment dismissing her personal injury action against Otis Elevator Company, claiming that the trial court erred by giving the jury certain jury instructions, by refusing to give certain requested instructions, and by excluding a portion of the maintenance contract. We affirm.
In 1988 Antelia Pruneda worked for the Seattle-King County Health Department on the 14th floor of the Public Safety Building in Seattle. The City owns the building, which contains several aged, mechanically driven elevators. Otis Elevator Company provided service and maintenance to those…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Dabroe v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Burke & Thomas, Inc. v. International Organization of MastersWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Jardine v. RubloffIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Otis Elevator Co. v. EmbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Lowrey v. Montgomery Kone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Kimball v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Isakson v. WSI CORP.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.