Legal Opinion
Crocker United Factors, Inc. v. Schultz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 8, 1980No. 79 Civ. 6039Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek reconsideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 636(b)(1)(A),1 of an order of Magistrate Kent Sinclair dated *142May 22, 1980 denying their motion to compel the production by the defendant Solomon Sperling of certain accountants’ work papers. For the reasons stated hereafter, the motion is granted and the matter is remanded to the magistrate for further proceedings not inconsistent with, this opinion.
This action is one for malpractice in the field of public accounting. The defendants are the former partners of Schultz, Hiltzik, Sperling &…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Louis Martin Radetsky, A/K/A L. M. RadetskyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles SussmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.