Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Eddy

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1969No. Civ. 34136PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order quashing service of summons and complaint upon defendants who are conceded to have been residents of New York at the time in question and were never personally served. The attempted service was made upon their attorney, Mr. Antin, pursuant to a provision in an agreement, executed by plaintiffs but not by defendants, in which the latter “hereby irrevocably appoints Michael Antin, Esq., as agent to accept service of process upon Eddy [collective] at any time hereafter in connection with any matter arising out of or in connection” therewith.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sternbeck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Solot v. LinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Arnesen v. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Kroopf v. GuffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Evangelize China Fellowship, Inc. v. Evangelize China FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API