Klein v. Avemco Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
It is first contended that since plaintiff paid seven of the ten premium installments, the policy should be considered as remaining in effect for seven-tenths of the year, or 255 days, which would mean the policy continued in force until 28 September 1973, well past 28 July 1973, the date when the airplane was damaged. Plaintiff urges that even without considering the last payment, the policy should be considered as having remained in force for six-tenths of the year, or 219 days, which would mean the policy continued in effect until 23 August 1973. We disagree.
‘‘It is elemental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grubbs v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Clifton v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Wall v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, Local No. 782 of Maywood and Vicinity, of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Blue Cab Company, Inc., General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, Local No. 782, Etc. v. Village Cab Company, General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, Local No. 782, Etc. v. Blue Cab Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Perry v. Farmers' Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978