Legal Opinion

State v. Sutton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 768SC481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

When these cases were called to trial, defendant moved to quash the indictments in No. 75CR10425 and No. 75CR10424 on the grounds that he had not been given a probable-cause hearing on those charges. In his first assignment of error, de*699fendant contends that the trial judge erred in failing to quash the indictments.

Prior to the adoption of the Pretrial Criminal Procedure Act (Chapter 15A of the General Statutes), the State could properly try a defendant on a bill of indictment without the benefit of a preliminary hearing. State v. Vick, 287 N.C. 37, 213 S.E. 2d 335 (1975); State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SummeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. DangerfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. BrackettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API