Legal Opinion
Intercargo Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 12, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-129; Court No. 94-05-00269Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DiCARLO, Chief Judge:
Intercargo Insurance Company, a corporate surety, provides customs bonds in the customs territory of the United States. In-tercargo filed a complaint alleging, inter alia, the United States Customs Service regulation regarding delinquent sureties, 19 C.F.R. § 113.38 (1994), violates due process and is subject to the statute of limitations.
Defendants moved to dismiss claiming a lack of jurisdiction based on standing, ripeness, and finality of agency action. Interear-go argued that the notices Customs sent to Intercargo pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Schering Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.