Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meehan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1963No. Appeal, No. 432PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The defendant was convicted of the crimes of aggravated robbery and conspiracy. He was sentenced to the penitentiary on the robbery conviction. Sentence, on the conspiracy conviction was suspended. On appeal, the Superior Court affirmed the judgment: Commonwealth, v. Meehan, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 558, 182 A. 2d 243 (1962). We granted allocatur.

Our study of the record and the unusual circumstances it discloses is convincing that a new trial is required for the réásons given in the minority opinion of Judge Flood of the Superior Court. See also, Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. MeehanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Ratajski v. West Penn Manufacturing & Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Corbin v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. BooneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. ArmbrusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Seifert v. Dumatic Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API