Legal Opinion

McManus v. Newcomb

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1948No. 627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant signed listing cards authorizing appellee, a broker, to offer for sale two properties owned by appellant, “with exclusive rights as my Agent for the period of 60 days.” Appellee endeavored to find purchasers by newspaper advertising and by showing the properties to interested persons. Before appellee had found a purchaser, and within two weeks after the listing, appellant sold both properties through other brokers. Appellee brought this action for commissions on the sales.

In her answer and at trial appellant contended that she signed the listing cards without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Harris v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Carter v. Hall & MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. CoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Dixon v. DoddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. National Savings & Trust Company, as Successor Trustee for the Alonzo Bliss Properties v. B. Franklin KahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  4. Mattingly v. BohnArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Weinreb v. StraussDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API