Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1983No. Nos. 82-4366, 82-4423PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the issue whether Congress intended to require the Immigration and Naturalization Service to obtain a Public Health Service medical certificate *1472before excluding self-declared homosexuals from the United States on the ground of affliction with a psychopathic personality, sexual deviation, or mental defect. We conclude that Congress did so intend. As a result, we hold that the possibility that the Lesbian/Gay Freedom Day organization and its officers will be denied their first amendment rights of free speech and association with homosexual aliens is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carl Basil Angelo Hill v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Lesbian/gay Freedom Day Committee, Inc. v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983