Legal Opinion

McDandal v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1979No. 2-278A59PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

McDandal appeals his trial court conviction of assault and battery upon a police officer, 1 claiming that he was never advised of his right to counsel. McDandal was without counsel throughout the trial proceedings. We reverse for the reason that an effective waiver of the right to counsel cannot be inferred from a silent record.

In Johnson v. Zerbst, (1938) 304 U.S. 458, at 465, 58 S.Ct. 1019, at 1023, 82 L.Ed. 1461, the United States Supreme Court discussed the constitutional right to counsel and the trial court’s responsibility in safeguarding this right:

The constitutional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Russell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wallace v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Forrest Eugene Smith v. Ward Lane, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Goffe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kirkham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Commitment of GPH v. GilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Morgan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API