Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mallios v. Baker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2000No. 98-0408Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Hecht

The principal question in this case is whether a person may buy all or part of a legal malpractice claim purely as an investment, unrelated to any other transaction. That is the issue that the defendant raised and the parties argued in the district court, and the issue that the district court decided. It is the issue that the parties briefed in the court of appeals, and the issue that the court of appeals decided.1 It is the issue that the parties briefed and argued in this Court. The answer is that if the interest purchased gives such a buyer not merely a share in any recovery but…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Douglas v. DelpTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API