Legal Opinion

Tate v. Rommel

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 1970No. 225-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a verdict for plaintiff and granting a new trial.

On September 28, 1967, plaintiff, Willie Tate, was employed by defendants Cecil and Roberta Rommel as a farm laborer. He was injured while driving defendants’ Jeep pickup. The complaint alleges defendants were negligent in supplying plaintiff with a dangerous and defective vehicle with which to perform his duties. Defendants answered, denying negligence and pleading, as defenses, contributory negligence and assumption of risk. On December 6, 1969, a unanimous verdict was returned for plaintiff.

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Nelson v. PlacanicaWashington Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. State v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Haddad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Sado v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API