Legal Opinion
McCracken v. City of Chinook, Mont.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 30, 1987No. CV-85-189-GFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, former police officers employed by the City of Chinook, Montana, bring the present action to recover monetary compensation for the named defendants’ alleged violations of the plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights, as well as the defendants’ violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Pub.L. 91-452, Title IX, 84 Stat. 941, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq. In addition, the plaintiffs ask the court to exercise pendent jurisdiction over numerous claims for relief founded upon the constitution,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taggart v. RutledgeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1987
- McIntyre v. Seminole County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Sublett v. DISTRICT SCHOOL BD. OF SUMTER CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Mogan v. City of HarlemMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Gardner v. School Board of Glades CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011