Holmes v. Cheney
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
This litigation was initiated by a taxpayer to test the constitutionality of Act 38 of the First Extraordinary Session of the 1961 Legislature. Said Act provides for the erection of a Revenue Department Building for the State. The trial court held the Act constitutional, and this appeal by the taxpayer follows.
Substance of the Act. The portions of the Act material to this litigation are as follows: Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5 create the “Arkansas Revenue Department Building Commission” (referred to as the “Commission”), composed of the Commissioner of Revenues, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Petition of Board of Public BuildingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Borchert v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- In the Matter of Constitutionality of Chapter 280, Or. Laws 1975Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Borchert v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.