Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1911No. A-854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cleveland County; R. McMillan, Judge. Bob Walker was convicted of larceny, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFurman, P. J.

The most serious question involved in this appeal is presented in defendant’s motion for a new trial, as follows :

“Because of the misconduct of the prosecuting counsel, Ben Williams, over the objection of the defendant, in his closing remarks to the jury, in which he used in substance the following language: T want to know why they did not come up like honest, men, and all be tried together [referring to the defendant, Bob Walker, and the codefendants, G. L. Jones and Buck Jones, who were not on trial], instead of asking for a severance and being tried separately,’ which remarks and conduct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Beatty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Tudor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. People v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API