Darling v. Williams
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 9, 1926:
Vinje, C. J.
The case presents a question of fact rather than one of law. .It is well settled that to constitute a valid delivery of a deed the grantor must not only intend a delivery but must part with dominion and control of the deed and the grantee must accept the delivery made. Prutsman v. Baker, 30 Wis. 644; Butts v. Rickards, 152 Wis. 318, 140 N. W. 1; Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 165 Wis. 146, 161 N. W. 369; Padden v. Padden, 171 Wis. 212, 177 N. W. 22. Here we have perhaps an intent on the part of the grantor, Mrs. Chase, that there shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Butts v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Zimmerman v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Padden v. PaddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allenbach v. RidenourNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- Herzing v. HessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Steuerwald v. SteuerwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Lawrence v. Children's Home & Aid SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939