San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Jewell
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 112 & 120)
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s (“Reclamation” or “the Bureau”) decision to make certain “Flow Augmentation” releases (“FARs”) of water beginning on August 13, 2013 from Lewi-ston Dam, a feature of the Trinity River Division (“TRD”) of the Central Valley Project (“CVP”). The stated purpose of the releases was to “reduce the likelihood, and potentially reduce the severity, of any Ich epizootic event that could lead to associated fish die…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. HaugrudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Sequoia ForestKeeper v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015