Gibson v. Department of Workforce Services

Per Curiam Opinion

¶1 Adam Gibson seeks review of the final decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board). Gibson asserts that the Board erred in determining that he quit his position without good cause, thereby making him ineligible for unemployment benefits.

¶2 The Board’s decision concerning whether a person voluntarily quit his employment and the associated inquiries concerning that person’s qualification for benefits presents mixed questions of fact and law that are more facfe-like because the fact-intensive inquiries do not lend themselves “to consistent resolution by a uniform body…