Legal Opinion

Condon v. Condon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2013No. 86130-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fl LE This opinlonwas filed for reeord at 15 i o-o a::'fh on M OJ"C..l-) ·'L\ _ z..o 1,3 \Olned4 R. Carpenterd- OCRonald /~preme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON VANESSA CONDON, ) ) No. 86130-7 Appellant, ) ) v. ) EnBanc ) FEL Y CONDON, ) ) Respondent. ) Filed MAR 21 2013 MADSEN, C.J.-In open court, appellant Vanessa Condon 1 and respondent Fely Condon entered into a stipulated settlement and dismissal with prejudice of Vanessa's claims against Fely, stemming from an automobile accident. Before payment of the settlement funds, Fely requested that Vanessa sign a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API