Legal Opinion

Olin Corp. v. Lambda Electronics, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 10, 1998No. 1:98-cv-00150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDGAR, Chief Judge."

I

This ease is before the Court on the motion of defendant Lambda Electronics, Inc. (“Lambda”) to dismiss (Court File No. 3) two of the causes of action asserted by plaintiff Olin Corporation (“Olin”). For the reasons set forth herein, the motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

II

Fed.R.CivP. 12(b)(6) provides that a complaint may be dismissed if it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) is to permit a defendant to test whether, as a matter of law, the plaintiff is entitled to relief even if everything…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ATS Southeast, Inc. v. Carrier Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. 11C MUSICDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
  5. Kramer v. Aventis CropScience USA Holding, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API