Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
It is conceded that the only question presented by this case is whether the beneficiary of an insured, who, the record discloses, was seriously afflicted with nephritis or Bright’s disease and was under the care of a physician and drawing sick benefits from another company at the time the application for insurance ivas made and tlie policy issued, can claim an estoppel on the part of the defendant company by reason.of the fact that the agent of the company soliciting the policy had knowledge of such facts and condition at the time the policy was issued and delivered, where by the terms of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Puckett v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Harris v. Bankers Health & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- American National Insurance v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peninsular Casualty Co. v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Strickland v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Lucas v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.