Legal Opinion
Peninsular Casualty Co. v. McCloud
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 4, 1933No. 22842PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. A special ground of the motion for a new trial complains of the exclusion of certain documentary evidence, but the evidence is not sufficiently set forth in the ground nor attached as an exhibit thereto. It follows, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, that the ground is not in proper form for consideration.
2. The remaining special grounds of the motion are merely elaborations of the general grounds.
3. “If after a policy of insurance has been issued, knowledge be .brought home to the insurer that certain statements material to the risk, made by the assured to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. BessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Matt v. Roman Catholic Mutual Protective SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Anderson v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Casey Enterprises, Inc. And D/B/A Pendley Hills Hardware and Minit Check Grocery, Fite H. Casey, Jr. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Parris & Son, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- The Home Insurance Company v. Michael J. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Reserve Life Insurance v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.