Legal Opinion

Fahd Bouksimi v. Pamela Jo Bondi, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03899Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FAHD BOUKSIMI, Case No. 25-cv-03899-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 9 10 PAMELA JO BONDI, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Pro se plaintiff Fahd Bouksimi sued the United States for what is said to be excessive 14 delay by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in deciding his 15 application for permanent resident status. Dkt. No. 1. Bouksimi alleges claims under the 16 Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) (APA), the Mandamus and Venue Act, 28 17 U.S.C. § 1361, and the Due…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Prymas Vaz v. David NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API