Legal Opinion

Stanback v. Parke, Davis & Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided October 1, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-0240(R)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DALTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Beatrice G. Stanback, brought this products liability suit seeking compensation for injuries allegedly caused by an injection of Fluogen, an influenza vaccine manufactured by the defendant, Parke, Davis and Company (hereinafter “Parke”). After full discovery and briefing of this case, the parties have narrowed the issues in controversy. As a result, there is no contention that there exists any defect in the manufacture of the vaccine. Similarly, there is no dispute that the drug is a beneficial commodity to the great majority of users.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. Chambers v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API