Legal Opinion
Ampero v. Comm'r of Corr.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 2017No. AC 38575PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
Opinion *672The petitioner, Alberto Ampero, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying, in part, his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus.1 On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly (1) concluded that his trial counsel provided effective assistance, (2) rejected his claim of actual innocence, and (3) rejected his claim that his due process rights were violated by the use of allegedly perjured testimony. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the disposition of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McClain v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Zachs v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Ampero v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Moon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.