In re the Estate of Leserman
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The application to reopen the decree settling the account of the executrix, made on December 16, 1926, is denied for the following reasons:(1) The testimony fails to establish any of the grounds mentioned in section 20, subdivision 6, of the Surrogate’s Court Act.(2) The decree is conclusive since the account set forth the sale and liquidation of certain assets of the decedent’s business. If any other assets, either by way of good will or otherwise, were claimed to have existed, objection should have been made to their omission from the account.(3) There is no evidence of fraud or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of LathamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- In re the Estate of CaldwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spaulding v. BenenatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Estate of TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Yumet Chacón v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Coffey v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- In re the Construction of the Will of BluesteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.