Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Wells Fargo & Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 22, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00416Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00416-KJM-GGH 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WELLS FARGO & CO.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 The City of Sacramento (“the City”) sues Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, 19 N.A. (collectively “Wells Fargo”), alleging Wells Fargo has for more than a decade engaged in a 20 pattern or practice of discriminatory mortgage lending in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act 21 and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API