Legal Opinion
United States v. Mastromatteo
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 19, 2008No. 06-2349PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant, Michael Mastro-matteo (“Mastromatteo”), appeals the district court’s denial of a motion for a hearing under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), and he challenges the reasonableness of his sentence. Mastromatteo pleaded guilty to four methamphetamine-related counts, and he did so without the benefit of a written plea agreement. Despite the absence of a written plea agreement, Mas-tromatteo asserts that he entered a conditional plea nonetheless and may challenge the denial of the Franks hearing. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Keith PickettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. PoulsenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Sidney BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James MathisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.