Legal Opinion

Village of Mettawa v. Carruthers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1988No. 2-88-0092PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

Defendant, June Carruthers, appeals from a judgment entered after a bench trial which found her to be in violation of the zoning ordinance of plaintiff, the Village of Mettawa (Village), for keeping an excessive number of horses on her property. Carruthers contends that the trial court erred because (1) the section of the zoning ordinance limiting the number of horses which may be kept on defendant’s property within the Village is void because of procedural errors at the time of its passage in 1976, (2) the zoning ordinance was inadmissible in trial, as offered, because it was not competent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. Ridgeview House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pickton v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People Ex Rel. Franklin v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Anderson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Village of Bourbonnais v. HerbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. People Ex Rel. Hansen v. PhelanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsFairfax County Circuit Court · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Hansen v. PhelanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API