GMBH v. Robert Bosch LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Anthony P. Patti, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I. Introduction
The Applicants in this case-financialright GmbH ("financialright"),1 Katharina Prinzessin zu Hohenlohe, Hartmut Bäumer and Eithne Higgins-ask this court to exercise its discretionary authority to assist in the production of evidence for use in a foreign tribunal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. Applicants claim that they "are current or potential litigants seeking relief in German and Irish courts in connection with Volkswagen AG ... and Bosch GmbH's ... well-known 'clean-diesel' fraud." (DE 1 at 9.) More precisely, each of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United Kingdom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- In re Ex Parte Application of JSC UNITED CHEMICAL COMPANY URALCHEM for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020