Legal Opinion

GMBH v. Robert Bosch LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 12, 2018No. Case No. 2:17–mc–51337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anthony P. Patti, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I. Introduction

The Applicants in this case-financialright GmbH ("financialright"),1 Katharina Prinzessin zu Hohenlohe, Hartmut Bäumer and Eithne Higgins-ask this court to exercise its discretionary authority to assist in the production of evidence for use in a foreign tribunal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. Applicants claim that they "are current or potential litigants seeking relief in German and Irish courts in connection with Volkswagen AG ... and Bosch GmbH's ... well-known 'clean-diesel' fraud." (DE 1 at 9.) More precisely, each of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United Kingdom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  2. In re Ex Parte Application of JSC UNITED CHEMICAL COMPANY URALCHEM for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API