Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Company v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 18, 2020No. 1:14-cv-06849Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ALUMINUM WAREHOUSING 13-md-2481 (PAE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION 14-cv-6849 (PAE) OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Since August 2014, Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) has been an individual plaintiff in this multi-district litigation, No. 13 MD 2481 (PAE). See Dkt. 551.1 During the course of this MDL, Defendants have produced to Kodak and other plaintiffs “millions of pages of documents,” and have appeared for “dozens of depositions.” Dkt. 1214 (“Def. Ltr.”).2 Counsel for Kodak have expended “an enormous [amount of]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kiobel v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. In re del Valle RuizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. GMBH v. Robert Bosch LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API