Legal Opinion

Cynthia Pinski v. City of Philomath; Blake Bowers; City of Corvallis; Rhoda Krause; John Does 1-5 (Philomath Police Department Trainers and Supervisors); Does 6-10 (Corvallis Police Department Trainers and Supervisors)

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 24, 2026No. 6:24-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION CYNTHIA PINSKI, Civ. No. 6:24-cv-00185-AA Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. CITY OF PHILOMATH; BLAKE BOWERS; CITY OF CORVALLIS; RHODA KRAUSE; JOHN DOES 1-5 (PHILOMATH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINERS AND SUPERVISORS); DOES 6-10 (CORVALLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINERS AND SUPERVISORS), Defendants. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. ECF No. 26. The Court concludes that this motion is suitable for resolution without…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API