Legal Opinion

Burnham v. MacWhinnie

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

In this action of replevin of a motor truck the plaintiff gave bond as required by G-. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 247, § 8, and took possession. The case was entered on August 5, 1963, and was marked for trial on August 13, 1963. On the latter date the defendant and his counsel went to the court house. The plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed a motion to discontinue before 9 a.m. The defendant’s counsel learned this, and seeing the plaintiff outside the court house, informed the plaintiff that he was to move that the motion be disallowed, and that the plaintiff should go to the court room. There the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Himelfarb v. Novadel Agene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Elliott v. Warwick Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Keown v. KeownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Spencer v. BurakiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prefer v. PHARMNETRX, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Burnham v. Clerk of First District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Burke v. Atlantic Research Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. J. I. Case Co. v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Paperades, Inc. v. CrawfordMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API