Legal Opinion
In re the Annexation of Part of Stock District No. 10 To Stock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 1959No. 38179PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
A petition was filed with the Board of County Commissioners of LeFlore County requesting that certain sections in Stock-District No. 10, an open stock-district, be annexed and become a part of the adjoining Stock-District No. 13, a closed stock-district, as provided by Title 4 O.S.1951 §§ 114.1 and 114.2. The petitioners alleged they constituted a majority of the legal voters residing in the sections sought to be annexed and the sections were situated in a parallel manner adjoining Stock-District No. 13.
The Board of County Commissioners ordered that the sections in question be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russett School District No. C-8 v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Burgin v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- O'BALLIET v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Modern Builders, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Opinion No. 78-218 (1978) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1978