Legal Opinion
Pius v. Bletsch
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.
Contract-purchaser Pius applied to the Town of Huntington Director of Engineering, Building and Housing (Director) for a building permit to construct an office building on property in a commercial zone. Subsequent to a preliminary assessment by the Town’s Department of Environmental Control, a positive SEQRA (State Environmental Quality Review Act) declaration indicated that the proposed building may have a significant adverse environmental impact. Thereupon, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Filmways Communications of Syracuse, Inc. v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Citizens for the Preservation of Windsor Terrace v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Neville v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach v. GavalasNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ziemba v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Steele v. Town of Salem Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Matter of Waterways Dev. Corp. v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.