Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 22, 2011No. 2:07-cv-01744-MCE-EFBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.

This case arises from a wrongful death action in which two different insurers, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) both provided certain insurance coverage. St. Paul issued a general liability issue policy with limits of $5,000,000 to Crown Equipment Corporation (“Crown”), the company that manufactured a forklift the decedent was operating at the time he was killed. The accident itself occurred at the premises utilized by Tasq Technology, Inc. (“Tasq”). Tasq was an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LMA North America, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API