Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
This case arises from a wrongful death action in which two different insurers, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) both provided certain insurance coverage. St. Paul issued a general liability issue policy with limits of $5,000,000 to Crown Equipment Corporation (“Crown”), the company that manufactured a forklift the decedent was operating at the time he was killed. The accident itself occurred at the premises utilized by Tasq Technology, Inc. (“Tasq”). Tasq was an…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LMA North America, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013