Legal Opinion

In Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas, Dated January 5, 1988. Richard Roe, Abc Corporation and Def L.P. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 25, 1988No. 930, 931, Docket 88-6021, 88-6023PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CEDARBAUM, District Judge:

These are appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the South-em District of New York, Robert L. Carter, Judge, adjudicating an individual and two related businesses in contempt for failure to turn over to him for in camera inspection a cassette tape-recording of a telephone conversation. The tape recording had been the object of a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm as to the individual and remand as to the business entities.

BACKGROUND

Appellants ABC Corp. and DEF, L.P., a limited partnership (“the entities”),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Johnson v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  4. Stockschlaeder & McDonald, Esqs. v. Kittay (In Re Stockbridge Funding Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Johnson v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API