Hinson v. State

OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

Hinson appeals his sentence for burglary of a habitation. ' See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02(a)(1) (Vernon 2003). We will affirm.

In his sole issue, Hinson argues that his trial counsel did .not request notice of the State’s intent to offer extraneous-offense evidence in the punishment phase of trial, and thus failed to render the effective assistance of counsel. Tex.Code Crim. PROC. Ann. art. 37.07, § 3(g) (Vernon Supp.2004-2005).

“Allegations of ineffectiveness must be firmly founded in the record as counsel is presumed to have rendered adequate assistance and…