Legal Opinion
Bellar v. Lake Erie Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 7, 1941No. Civil Action No. 338PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
This action, commenced in the state court and removed to this court by the defendant, is brought to recover for personal injuries which the plaintiff alleges he received as a result of the defendant’s negligence, and as a result óf its having supplied defective equipment. The defendant is an Ohio corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of tear gas and other chemical protective devices. The matter before me now is a motion to quash the writ of summons on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction over the defendant corporation.
Process was served on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donley v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
- Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Coakley v. Frank A. Munsey Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943