Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Haskins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1991No. 2-90-1280PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendants, Dawn Haskins, Walter Huhn and Barbara Quinones, appeal from a decision of the trial court granting plaintiff, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, judgment on its complaint for declaratory relief. Defendants argue: (1) necessary and indispensable parties were not joined in the action; (2) State Farm’s failure to file a written response to Quinones’ affirmative defense constituted an admission of coverage; (3) the trial court erred by not granting Quinones a continuance to locate and secure the testimony of a witness; (4) the trial court erred by not striking the testimony of a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Deckard v. JoinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People Ex Rel. Meyer v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mooney v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Safeway Insurance Co. v. HarveyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. West Bend Mutual Insurance v. SalemiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Society of Mount Carmel v. National Ben Franklin InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Mt. Carmel Soc. v. NAT. BEN FRANK. INS.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. In Re Estate of ThorpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Filliung v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Allied American Insurance v. AyalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API