Commonwealth v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY*, Justice.
The question before this Court today is whether the appellant, Alphonso Rogers, has a constitutional right to dismiss counsel and proceed pro se before the Superior Court after appointed counsel has filed appellate briefs. For the following reasons, we hold that Appellant has no such right and therefore affirm the order of the Superior Court.
Appellant was convicted of rape,1 two counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse,2 burglary,3 robbery4 and two counts of simple assault.5 A sentence of twelve to thirty years imprisonment was imposed. In 1985,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. MonicaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by45 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.