Hill v. Hill
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke
The legal problem here presented for our consideration concerns payment of alimony for the support of a wife and her minor daughter, the latter having now attained her majority. It appears from the record that December 20, 1924, Ruth Irene Hill, plaintiff in error here, procured a decree of divorce from defendant in error, Harold C. Hill, in which decree alimony payments were ordered in accordance with a formal stipulation executed by the parties. Subsequently, in July, 1936, after some modifications as to the alimony payments, the wife filed in the trial court a “motion for delinquent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fearnley v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Green v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Moran v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3Cited by23 opinions
- Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- A,B,C,D,E,F,G, & H v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Losavio v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & TalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Tiokasin v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.