Bishop v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.
The trial court convicted Mark Dywayne Bishop of driving after having been declared an habitual offender in violation of Code § 46.2-357(A) and obstruction of justice in violation of Code § 18.2-460(C). On appeal, Bishop claims (i) the habitual offender conviction should be reversed for insufficient evidence, and (ii) the obstruction of justice conviction should be vacated because the statute invites an unconstitutionally broad scope of prosecutorial discretion. Finding neither argument persuasive, we affirm.
I
Under settled principles, we review the evidence in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parrish v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Parks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bishop v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Battle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Bishop v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007