Eugene v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
In this appeal we address a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of article 102.011 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which imposes on persons convicted of a felony or misdemeanor a cost of court for summoning witnesses. We address whether the record is sufficient to assess the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim and whether appellant Allan Eugene met his burden to show article 102.011 denied him constitutional rights. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 2004, a grocery…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Devlon Deaquel Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Johnny Melchor MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- Jermaine Earvin Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Castello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Aaron Michael Blay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.