Legal Opinion

Eugene v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 10, 2017No. 14-16-00391-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

In this appeal we address a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of article 102.011 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which imposes on persons convicted of a felony or misdemeanor a cost of court for summoning witnesses. We address whether the record is sufficient to assess the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim and whether appellant Allan Eugene met his burden to show article 102.011 denied him constitutional rights. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 2004, a grocery…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Devlon Deaquel Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Johnny Melchor MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
  3. Jermaine Earvin Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  4. Castello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Aaron Michael Blay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API